Rajesh Gupta
Jammu, Apr 21: Pankaj Sharma VC JDA trying best to bring countless reforms ,to ease public for their genuine works including vacation of encroached plots, reconstruction of missing files, clearing of NOCs for early clearance of BP Cases, procedure for early clearance of routine files in a time bound manner but still lot he has to do on various issues, which are not being brought to his notice by some of Officers/officials of JDA.
VC must act upon by calling details of ATRs of all communications marked by VC office to concerned officers for actions, however CTN is in possession of some documents, which has been marked by his office for reports but are not being returned back, otherwise his "Personal Section" has to look into these issue, so that VC can be informed by them accordingly for actions on defaulting officers for causing intentional delays in public works.
It is also one matter of concern that some encroachers have encroached JDA's prime Land adjoining canal at "Railway Station" since years & have constructed structures but till day neither JDA charging any rent from them nor vacating that prime land, otherwise it can bring crore of rupee to JDA as Revenue & for such a lapse, VC should act on the concerned officers for causing loss to JDA or JDA should decide the issue by charging market rate from the concerned encroachers, who have constructed their structures since years on the said land without any rent or fee to JDA?
It is also the time for JDA to get details of all JDA lands from Revenue wing of JDA & be fenced to stop encroachments /litigations in near future.
Pending BP cases in Town Planning Section needed to be looked into with details, which are lying after expiry of prescribed time granted for its clearance & concerned be taken to task for non compliance of Govt Orders into the matter.
VC Should also act on rejections of BP cases by quoting "Proposed Roads" otherwise he should act whether any of so called Proposed Road of MP of 2032, which was notified in March 2017 i.e. 08 years back has been notified till day or taken up for construction by JDA, otherwise how JDA can consider private lands as its property by rejecting BP cases by putting such an illegal observation?
Above all, he should walk on any of so called "Proposed Road" of Master Plan to see how many illegal constructions has taken place without approved BP Case causing loss to Govt to crores as BP fee but innocents who wanted to pay Fee to Govt, for legal building permission, their cases are being rejected by quoting "Proposed Road".
|