Chandigarh, July 31: In a petition filed by the petitioner titled AGR Steel Strips (P) Ltd. v. RBI, CWP-34297-2019, highlighting the non-compliance of the directions of the present Court by the Trial Court concerned, the Division Bench of Sureshwar Thakur and Sudeepti Sharma, JJ., stated that it appeared that the Trial Court had prima facie wantonly disregarded the said directions, and had proceeded to invite responses from the Public Prosecutor concerned.
Subsequently, the Trial Court also ordered for consideration, being made, on the application filed by the petitioner, asking for implementation of the said directions.
Therefore, the Court stated that the Trial Judge and Public Prosecutor concerned were required to furnish explanations, as to why further proceedings for contempt of Court be not initiated against them.
|